Mathematical Challenges in Biology: Identifying Core Learning Difficulties

Authors

  • Novita Vindri Harini Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33752/discovery.v10i1.8702

Keywords:

Absolute value, Basic mathematics, Biology students, Learning improvement, Mathematical difficulties, Probability

Abstract

Biology students often face difficulties in understanding basic mathematical concepts, which can impact their comprehension of advanced science courses. This study aims to identify the key mathematical topics that pose challenges for first-year biology students to facilitate instructional improvements before the final exam. The research involved an analysis of midterm exam results from 90 students enrolled in a Basic Mathematics course. The data examined included completion time and accuracy rates across six key topics: equations and inequalities, matrices, absolute value, real numbers, probability, and sets. The results indicated that probability had the longest average completion time (4 minutes 36 seconds), while absolute value had the highest error rate, with only 13.19% correct responses. Further interviews revealed that students struggled with understanding the formal concept of absolute value and often misapplied probability rules for independent events. These findings highlight the need for improved teaching strategies, particularly for topics with high error rates, such as concept-based approaches and more structured problem-solving exercises. Enhancing students' mathematical proficiency through targeted interventions is expected to better prepare them for future academic challenges.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Canner, J., & Clinkenbeard, J. E. (2023). Threshold Concepts in Quantitative Reasoning.

Numeracy, 17(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.17.1.1446

Cooper, K. M., Downing, V. R., & Brownell, S. E. (2018). The influence of active learning

practices on student anxiety in large-enrollment college science classrooms.

International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-

-6

England, B. J., Brigati, J. R., Schussler, E. E., & Chen, M. M. (2019). Student anxiety and

perception of difficulty impact performance and persistence in introductory biology

courses. CBE Life Sciences Education, 18(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-12-

Etobro, A. B., & Fabinu, O. E. (2017). Students’ perceptions of difficult concepts in biology

in senior secondary schools in Lagos state. Global Journal of Educational Research, 16(2),

https://doi.org/10.4314/gjedr.v16i2.8

Everingham, Y. L., Gyuris, E., & Connolly, S. R. (2017). Enhancing student engagement to

positively impact mathematics anxiety, confidence and achievement for

interdisciplinary science subjects. International Journal of Mathematical Education in

Science and Technology,

(8), 1153–1165.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1305130

Feliciano-Semidei, R., Wu, K., & Chaphalkar, R. M. (2022). Introducing conditional

probability using the Monty Hall problem. Journal of University Teaching and Learning

Practice, 19(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.19.2.7

Flanagan, K. M., & Einarson, J. (2017). Gender, math confidence, and grit: Relationships

with quantitative skills and performance in an undergraduate biology course. CBE Life

Sciences Education, 16(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-08-0253

Fleischner, T. L., Espinoza, R. E., Gerrish, G. A., Greene, H. W., Kimmerer, R. W., Lacey, E.

A., Pace, S., Parrish, J. K., Swain, H. M., Trombulak, S. C., Weisberg, S., Winkler, D. W., &

Zander, L. (2017). Teaching Biology in the Field: Importance, Challenges, and Solutions.

BioScience, 67(6), 558–567. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix036

Gunarti, M. R., Harini, N. V., Zuhri, Z., & Dharmawan, P. B. (2022, December). Interpreting

kinematics graph: What do students’ show?. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2468,

No. 1). AIP Publishing.

Harini, N. V., Fuad, Y., & Ekawati, R. (2018). Students’ covariational reasoning in solving

integrals’ problems. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 947, No. 1, p. 012017).

IOP Publishing.

Harini, N. V. (2019, February). Capturing students’ covariational reasoning levels while

solving integrals problem. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1157, No. 4, p.

. IOP Publishing.

Harini, N. V. (2024). Design Contextual Problems and Solutions Related to Linear

Programming Topics with The Help Of Geogebra. Noumerico: Journal of Technology in

Mathematics Education, 2(2), 156-164.

Hoffman, K., Leupen, S., Dowell, K., Kephart, K., & Leips, J. (2016). Development and

assessment of modules to integrate quantitative skills in introductory biology courses.

CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-09-0186

Hurrell, D. (2021). Conceptual Knowledge OR Procedural Knowledge or Conceptual

Knowledge AND Procedural Knowledge: Why the Conjunction is Important to Teachers.

Australian Journal of Teacher Education,

(2), 57–71.

https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2021v46n2.4

Ikhsan, M. M., & Sa’adah, N. (2024). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Stad

Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa Sma. Discovery : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan,

(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.53565/pssa.v6i2.180

Li, Y., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2019). Problematizing teaching and learning mathematics as

“given” in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1).

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0197-9

Louie, N. (2020). Agency Discourse and the Reproduction of Hierarchy in Mathematics

Instruction.

Cognition and Instruction,

(1), 1–26.

https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1677664

Luque, A., Mullinix, J., Anderson, M., Williams, K. S., & Bowers, J. (2022). Aligning Calculus

with Life Sciences Disciplines: The Argument for Integrating Statistical Reasoning.

Primus, 32(2), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2021.1881847

Maass, K., Geiger, V., Ariza, M. R., & Goos, M. (2019). The Role of Mathematics in

interdisciplinary STEM education. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 51(6), 869–884.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01100-5

Miswaro, S. M., & Zuhri, Z. (2023). ANALISIS KESULITAN SISWA DALAM

MENYELESAIKAN SOAL CERITA MATEMATIKA PADA MATERI STATISTIKA DITINJAU

DARI KEMAMPUAN MATEMATIKA SISWA. Center of Education Journal (CEJou), 4(2).

Purba, D., Harini, N. H., Mirianto, A. D., & Zuhri, Z. (2019, December). Applying Spherical

Triangle Concept in Simulator to Determine Distance and Direction of Ship.

In Mathematics, Informatics, Science, and Education International Conference (MISEIC

(pp. 36-38). Atlantis Press.

Spooner, F., Saunders, A., Root, J., & Brosh, C. (2017). Promoting Access to Common Core

Mathematics for Students with Severe Disabilities Through Mathematical Problem

Solving. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 42(3), 171–186.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796917697119

Sriwijayati, A. M., Febriyanti, R., & Albab, M. U. (2024). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran

Berbasis Masalah Berbantuan Geogebra Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa

Smp.

Discovery : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan,

(2), 122–130.

https://doi.org/10.36928/jsm.v6i2.2813

Warshauer, H. K. (2015). Productive struggle in middle school mathematics classrooms.

Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,

(4), 375–400.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9286-3

Zahro, S. F., & Zuhri, Z. (2024). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam

Menyelesaikan Masalah Materi Program Linear Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif FieldDependent dan Field-Independent. Discovery : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan, 09(October),

–121.

Zuhri, Z., Hamdani, A. S., & Harini, N. V. (2022). Analisis Koneksi Matematika Siswa

dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Ditinjau dari Kecenderungan Gaya Berpikir. Musamus

Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(2), 108-118.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-13

How to Cite

Harini, N. V. (2025). Mathematical Challenges in Biology: Identifying Core Learning Difficulties . Discovery : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan, 10(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.33752/discovery.v10i1.8702